7/30/2014 2:11:00 PM Opening lands to renewable energy could make state a 'solar capital'
Eric Fitzer, center, of the Governor’s Office of Energy Policy, told a House committee that a bill that would open public land to renewable energy development could make Arizona the “solar capital of the world” if the state could take advantage of available land. (Cronkite News Service photo by Matthew Seeman)
A bill to boost the development of renewable energy projects on public lands could also boost lease and royalty payments from those lands, supporters say. The bill calls for revenues from renewable-energy projects to be split between:
- 25 percent to states where the revenue is created.
- 25 percent to counties where the revenue is created.
- 25 percent to a renewable-energy resource conservation fund.
- 15 percent to Bureau of Land Management state offices and Forest Service regional offices in states where the revenue is created (for the first 15 years the bill is law).
- the remainder to the Treasury Department's general fund.
By Matthew Seeman Cronkite News Service
WASHINGTON - Arizona could become the "solar capital of the world" if public lands can be made more readily available for renewable energy development, an Arizona official told a House subcommittee Tuesday.
Eric Fitzer was one of two Arizonans - along with La Paz County Board of Supervisors Chairman D.L. Wilson - testifying in support of a bill that calls for pilot programs to lease federal land for renewable energy development. Royalties from subsequent energy sales would be split between state, local and federal governments and conservation efforts.
Fitzer, senior energy programs manager for the Governor's Office on Energy Policy, told a House Natural Resources subcommittee that Arizona has grown its renewable portfolio in the last few years, but access to federal land would help it make great strides toward developing solar energy. The federal government owns 42 percent of the state's nearly 73 million acres, Fitzer said - land the state needs to reach its full renewable-energy potential.
"For Arizona to become the solar capital of the world, Arizona will look to development of public lands in order to achieve this goal," Fitzer said.
The bill's sponsor, Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Prescott, said in opening remarks that public land provides tremendous potential for producing renewable energy and reducing dependence on foreign energy. He said his bill would streamline the permitting process and shorten wait times, encouraging more development.
"Uncertainty in the permitting process impedes or delays our ability to harness our renewable energy potential, and it must be reformed," Gosar said.
Another benefit to increased renewable energy production would be increased royalties, which can be used by local governments for roads, law enforcement and other services, Wilson said. While he was testifying on behalf of the National Association of Counties, Wilson said any extra royalty money in La Paz County would likely go toward road repair.
"This revenue sharing will ... provide the county with the much-needed resources to provide the infrastructure and services that our citizens depend upon," he said.
But the royalties and the competitive leasing of federal land worried Arthur Haubenstock, chairman of the Solar Energy Industries Association's utility-scale solar power division. He testified that large-scale solar is not mature enough for competitive bidding and payment of royalties, which could lead to a disincentive to innovate instead of the industry growth supporters envision.
"There's a question of risk, and there's a question of how will these factors work together," Haubenstock said.
The Bureau of Land Management is concerned, on the other hand, that lease and royalty payments may not be enough for "an appropriate return to U.S. taxpayers" on the land, said Michael Nedd, an assistant director for energy, minerals and realty management. Nedd said the bureau shares the goals of the bill, but wants to work with lawmakers to ensure it's both efficient and safe.
In addition to feeding government coffers, the bill calls for 25 percent of any proceeds from renewable energy development projects to be set aside in a conservation fund to help offset any damage a project causes to the land. That provision drew the support of Trout Unlimited.
"This conservation fund is essential to our ability to balance wind and solar energy development with the kind of unparalleled hunting and fishing opportunities that make our western public lands a prime destination," said Chris Wood, president and CEO of Trout Unlimited.
Ultimately, Gosar said, the bill is an example of various levels of government collaborating to solve mutual problems, helping local communities affected in the process.
"I want my cake, and I want to eat it too," he said.
Posted: Wednesday, July 30, 2014
Article comment by:
Let's see. Seems to me the President the Republicans in the House want to sue for using his Executive Authority legally to get something done for the country has been saying for years that we should be doing more to get renewable energy going and that one of the Republicans' poster children used "Drill, Baby, Drill" as her mantra that was chanted by her followers.
So to get this straight--now that the Republicans are suing the President, it's okay for them to claim to want to jump on renewable energy like it's a new thought?
Of course, to make it all very do-able, this will take up Federal land (parks and forests?). Why not encourage solar on rooftops? Was that getting too sensible? Too helpful to the average homeowner?
You see, while all this is made to look like it's good for the nation, it's really privatizing more and more programs that are being taken away from you and me and the average joe to put it in the pockets of the already very ultra rich.
And the voters don't seem to want to see that. They seem to want to mosey along like the corporations will take care of us.
Bring back the benefits for rooftop solar and see how fast this benefits everyone, not just the corporate oligarchs. Rooftop solar provided revenue sharing, for goodness sake. And it doesn't cause possible damage to public lands.
We the People are smarter than our legislators think we are and could get enough solar going--no doubt faster--to benefit everyone.
But then that helps prevent us from becoming a Third World Country, and the oligarchs lose.
Why does Gosar who wants smaller government want the government to jump in?